Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Redding, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Redding, CA.
Data | Fort calhoun | Redding |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,115 | 92,906 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $75,900 | $67,323 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Redding
- The population in Redding is higher at 92,906, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 38.8 years in Redding.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $67,323 in Redding.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Redding.
- The poverty level is higher in Redding at 13%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- Redding has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Redding provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort calhoun | Redding |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 85 | 71 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Redding
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Redding at 1%.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 71% in Redding.
- In Redding, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
- Redding has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Redding at 10%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- In Redding, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Redding |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 11.9% |
Depression | 15.3% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 33.3% | 30.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Redding
- In Redding, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Redding at 22.1% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Redding has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 17.6% in Redding.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort calhoun at 33.3% compared to 30.9% in Redding.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Redding at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort calhoun | Redding |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (581) |
High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 14.2% (13,235) |
Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 9.2% (8,540) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 18.3% (16,986) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Redding
- In Redding, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 14.2% in Redding.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Redding at 9.2%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- In Redding, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.