Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Newark, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Newark, NJ.
Data | Fort calhoun | Newark |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,115 | 305,344 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $75,900 | $46,460 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 30% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 7.8 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 305,344, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 30%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 7.8% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort calhoun | Newark |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 47 |
White | 85 | 3 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Newark
- In Newark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 3% in Newark.
- In Newark, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
- Newark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newark at 11%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Newark |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 14.8% |
Depression | 15.3% | 18.2% |
Smoking | 14.0% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 33.3% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Newark
- In Newark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newark at 18.2% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Newark has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Newark has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newark at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort calhoun | Newark |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (7,516) |
High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 21.9% (66,812) |
Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 24.1% (73,461) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 11.1% (33,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 21.9% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newark at 24.1%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.1% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.