Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Golden, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Golden, CO.
| Data | Fort calhoun | Golden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,115 | 20,460 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $75,900 | $90,990 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Golden
- The population in Golden is higher at 20,460, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 35.2 years in Golden.
- Golden has a higher median income of $90,990, compared to $75,900 in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Golden.
- Fort calhoun has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Golden.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort calhoun and Golden at 2.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Golden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort calhoun | Golden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 85 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Golden
- In Golden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 80% in Golden.
- In Golden, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
- Golden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort calhoun at 8% compared to 6% in Golden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Golden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Golden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 22.0% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 24.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Golden
- In Golden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Golden at 20.2% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort calhoun at 14.0% compared to 13.5% in Golden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 22.0% in Golden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort calhoun at 33.3% compared to 24.7% in Golden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort calhoun at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Golden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort calhoun | Golden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 10.2% (2,094) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 5.3% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 35.1% (7,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Golden
- In Golden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 10.2% in Golden.
- More residents in Fort calhoun have less than a high school education at 6.5% compared to 5.3% in Golden.
- In Golden, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.