Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Godley, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Godley, TX.
| Data | Fort calhoun | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,115 | 2,674 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $75,900 | $56,792 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Godley
- The population in Godley is higher at 2,674, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Godley.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $56,792 in Godley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 33.0% in Godley.
- The poverty level is higher in Godley at 11%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- Godley has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Godley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort calhoun | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Godley
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Godley at 1%.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 81% in Godley.
- Both Fort calhoun and Godley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Godley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort calhoun at 8% compared to 3% in Godley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Godley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Godley
- In Godley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Godley at 24.3% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Godley has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 19.7% in Godley.
- Godley has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort calhoun at 12.0% compared to 4.0% in Godley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort calhoun | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 13.1% (350) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 9.7% (260) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 6.4% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Godley
- In Godley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 13.1% in Godley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Godley at 9.7%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 6.4% in Godley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.