Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Central city, KY.

Data Fort calhoun Central city
Population 1,115 5,810
Median Age 44.1 years 33.5 years
Median Income $75,900 $52,184
Married Families 40.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% 16%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Central city

  • The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
  • Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
  • Central city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.

Demographics

Demographics Fort calhoun vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort calhoun Central city
Black 1 3
White 85 88
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 6 2
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Central city

  • In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 85% in Fort calhoun.
  • Both Fort calhoun and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort calhoun at 6% compared to 2% in Central city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort calhoun at 8% compared to 6% in Central city.
  • In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort calhoun Central city
Mental Health Not Good 12.3% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 15.5%
Depression 15.3% 26.8%
Smoking 14.0% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 22.1% 14.8%
Obesity 33.3% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort calhoun Central city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 33.7% (376) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 6.5% (72) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (161) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Central city

  • In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.