Environment details: Fort atkinson WI
Moderate; relies on old infrastructure.
Environment details: Southfield MI
Low quality due to many pollutants.
Compare Environment: Fort atkinson WI vs Southfield MI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Fort atkinson | Southfield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 740 | 1183 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate; relies on old infrastructure. | Low quality due to many pollutants. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.71 | 1.86 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 30 | 54 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Southfield
- Water quality is rated higher in Fort atkinson at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Southfield.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Southfield with an average index of 1.86 compared to 1.71 in Fort atkinson.
- Southfield experiences more days with poor air quality at 54 compared to 30 in Fort atkinson.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.