Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Schenectady, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Schenectady, NY.
Data | Fort atkinson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,412 | 68,809 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $72,215 | $54,650 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Schenectady
- The population in Schenectady is higher at 68,809, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
- Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.0 years in Schenectady.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $54,650 in Schenectady.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 28.0% in Schenectady.
- The poverty level is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- Schenectady has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Fort atkinson vs Schenectady provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort atkinson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 20 |
White | 89 | 47 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 47% in Schenectady.
- In Schenectady, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
- Schenectady has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- In Schenectady, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort atkinson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 12.5% |
Depression | 23.6% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 34.0% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Schenectady at 24.0% versus 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
- Schenectady has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 16.2% in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Schenectady at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort atkinson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (160) | 1.7% (1,194) |
High School Diploma | 20.8% (2,578) | 15.3% (10,540) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (1,595) | 14.7% (10,146) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (2,436) | 15.0% (10,303) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 15.3% in Schenectady.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Schenectady at 14.7%, compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Schenectady.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.