Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs San francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs San francisco, CA.

Data Fort atkinson San francisco
Population 12,412 808,437
Median Age 42.0 years 39.3 years
Median Income $72,215 $136,689
Married Families 41.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.6

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs San francisco

  • The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 39.3 years in San francisco.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
  • The poverty level is higher in San francisco at 12%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • San francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson San francisco
Black Data is updating 5
White 89 31
Asian Data is updating 37
Hispanic 8 16
Two or More Races 3 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • San francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San francisco at 10%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson San francisco
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 8.4%
Depression 23.6% 15.7%
Smoking 16.0% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 16.4%
Obesity 34.0% 19.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs San francisco

  • More residents in Fort atkinson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 16.0% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort atkinson at 34.0% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson San francisco
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 3.0% (23,928)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 8.5% (68,418)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 12.4% (99,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 50.3% (406,774)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • More residents in Fort atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 12.4% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.