Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Plymouth, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Plymouth, IN.

Data Fort atkinson Plymouth
Population 12,412 10,705
Median Age 42.0 years 35.4 years
Median Income $72,215 $49,306
Married Families 41.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 9% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Plymouth

  • In Fort atkinson, the population is higher at 12,412, compared to 10,705 in Plymouth.
  • Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 35.4 years in Plymouth.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $49,306 in Plymouth.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 29.0% in Plymouth.
  • The poverty level is higher in Plymouth at 13%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • Plymouth has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs Plymouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson Plymouth
Black Data is updating 2
White 89 68
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 8 27
Two or More Races 3 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Plymouth

  • In Plymouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 68% in Plymouth.
  • Both Fort atkinson and Plymouth have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Plymouth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • Both Fort atkinson and Plymouth have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Plymouth at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson Plymouth
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 14.2%
Depression 23.6% 27.7%
Smoking 16.0% 23.2%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 15.0%
Obesity 34.0% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Plymouth

  • In Plymouth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Plymouth at 27.7% versus 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
  • Plymouth has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 15.0% in Plymouth.
  • Plymouth has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Plymouth at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson Plymouth
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 0.9% (101)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 20.3% (2,178)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 23.8% (2,543)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 11.1% (1,192)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Plymouth

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Plymouth.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 20.3% in Plymouth.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Plymouth at 23.8%, compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 11.1% in Plymouth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.