Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Meadville, PA.
| Data | Fort atkinson | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,412 | 12,680 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $72,215 | $46,157 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Meadville
- The population in Meadville is higher at 12,680, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
- Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Fort atkinson vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort atkinson | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 89 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 86% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort atkinson at 8% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meadville at 6%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Meadville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort atkinson | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort atkinson | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (160) | 0.2% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (2,578) | 24.5% (3,110) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,595) | 8.6% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (2,436) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 20.8% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents in Fort atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.