Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Fort atkinson | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,412 | 994 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,215 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Mc graw
- In Fort atkinson, the population is higher at 12,412, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $60,781 in Mc graw.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Mc graw.
- Fort atkinson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Fort atkinson vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort atkinson | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Mc graw
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Mc graw at 0%.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 88% in Mc graw.
- Both Fort atkinson and Mc graw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort atkinson at 8% compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort atkinson | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Mc graw
- In Mc graw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
- Mc graw has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 19.1% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mc graw at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort atkinson | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (160) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (2,578) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,595) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (2,436) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 20.8% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.