Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Clayton, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Clayton, NY.
| Data | Fort atkinson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,412 | 4,781 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $72,215 | $74,471 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Clayton
- In Fort atkinson, the population is higher at 12,412, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 42.0 years in Fort atkinson.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471, compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Fort atkinson vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort atkinson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Clayton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Clayton at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 95% compared to 89% in Fort atkinson.
- Both Fort atkinson and Clayton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort atkinson at 8% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 4%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort atkinson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Clayton
- More residents in Fort atkinson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort atkinson at 34.0% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort atkinson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (160) | 0.1% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (2,578) | 18.3% (874) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,595) | 14.2% (679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (2,436) | 20.6% (983) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 18.3% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 14.2%, compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.