Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Brookhaven, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Brookhaven, MS.

Data Fort atkinson Brookhaven
Population 12,412 11,608
Median Age 42.0 years 42.0 years
Median Income $72,215 $32,869
Married Families 41.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 9% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.1

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Brookhaven

  • In Fort atkinson, the population is higher at 12,412, compared to 11,608 in Brookhaven.
  • The median age is the same in both Fort atkinson and Brookhaven at 42.0 years.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brookhaven at 20%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • Brookhaven has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson Brookhaven
Black Data is updating 57
White 89 39
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 8 2
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Brookhaven

  • In Brookhaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 39% in Brookhaven.
  • In Brookhaven, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort atkinson at 8% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort atkinson at 3% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Brookhaven at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson Brookhaven
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 13.6%
Depression 23.6% 21.5%
Smoking 16.0% 21.2%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 12.4%
Obesity 34.0% 45.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Brookhaven

  • In Brookhaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 21.5% in Brookhaven.
  • Brookhaven has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 12.4% in Brookhaven.
  • Brookhaven has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brookhaven at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson Brookhaven
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 0.8% (96)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 19.7% (2,281)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 11.7% (1,357)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 14.6% (1,696)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Brookhaven

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in Brookhaven.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 19.7% in Brookhaven.
  • More residents in Fort atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 11.7% in Brookhaven.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 14.6% in Brookhaven.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.