Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Boomer, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Boomer, NC.

Data Fort atkinson Boomer
Population 12,412 1,213
Median Age 42.0 years 53.9 years
Median Income $72,215 $50,367
Married Families 41.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Boomer

  • In Fort atkinson, the population is higher at 12,412, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
  • The median age in Boomer is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 42.0 years in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
  • In Boomer, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Boomer at 12%, compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • Boomer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs Boomer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson Boomer
Black Data is updating 5
White 89 91
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 8 2
Two or More Races 3 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Boomer

  • In Boomer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Boomer at 91% compared to 89% in Fort atkinson.
  • Both Fort atkinson and Boomer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort atkinson at 8% compared to 2% in Boomer.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort atkinson at 3% compared to 2% in Boomer.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Boomer at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson Boomer
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% Data is updating%
Depression 23.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 16.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 23.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 34.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Boomer

  • More residents in Fort atkinson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort atkinson at 34.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson Boomer
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 21.2% (257)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 25.9% (314)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 9.6% (116)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Boomer

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
  • In Boomer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 20.8% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boomer at 25.9%, compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.