Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Adamsburg, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Adamsburg, PA.

Data Fort atkinson Adamsburg
Population 12,412 143
Median Age 42.0 years 27.6 years
Median Income $72,215 $71,429
Married Families 41.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 9% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.1

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Adamsburg

  • In Fort atkinson, the population is higher at 12,412, compared to 143 in Adamsburg.
  • Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 27.6 years in Adamsburg.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215 compared to $71,429 in Adamsburg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 22.0% in Adamsburg.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fort atkinson and Adamsburg at 9%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort atkinson is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Adamsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs Adamsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson Adamsburg
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 89 92
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 8 Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Adamsburg

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Adamsburg at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Adamsburg at 92% compared to 89% in Fort atkinson.
  • Both Fort atkinson and Adamsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort atkinson at 8% compared to 0% in Adamsburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Adamsburg at 7%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Adamsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson Adamsburg
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 12.5%
Depression 23.6% 22.6%
Smoking 16.0% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 19.3%
Obesity 34.0% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Adamsburg

  • In Adamsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 22.6% in Adamsburg.
  • Adamsburg has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 19.3% in Adamsburg.
  • Adamsburg has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Adamsburg at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson Adamsburg
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 19.6% (28)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 2.8% (4)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 7.0% (10)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Adamsburg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Adamsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 19.6% in Adamsburg.
  • More residents in Fort atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 2.8% in Adamsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 7.0% in Adamsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.