Demographics details for Forrest city, AR vs Piqua, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forrest city, AR vs Piqua, OH.
Data | Forrest city | Piqua |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,676 | 20,607 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $36,368 | $55,379 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Forrest city vs Piqua
- The population in Piqua is higher at 20,607, compared to 12,676 in Forrest city.
- The median age in Piqua is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 35.2 years in Forrest city.
- Piqua has a higher median income of $55,379, compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
- In Piqua, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Piqua.
- The unemployment rate in Forrest city is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.5% in Piqua.
Demographics
Demographics Forrest city vs Piqua provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forrest city | Piqua |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 2 |
White | 16 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forrest city vs Piqua
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forrest city at 73% compared to 2% in Piqua.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Piqua at 92% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
- In Piqua, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Forrest city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forrest city at 6% compared to 1% in Piqua.
- Both Forrest city and Piqua have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Forrest city at 1% compared to 0% in Piqua.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forrest city | Piqua |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 13.1% |
Depression | 21.2% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 26.2% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 49.7% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forrest city vs Piqua
- More residents in Forrest city report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.8% in Piqua.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Piqua at 23.9% versus 21.2% in Forrest city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forrest city at 26.2% compared to 23.2% in Piqua.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Piqua at 17.2% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forrest city at 49.7% compared to 42.0% in Piqua.
- Disability percentages are higher in Forrest city at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Piqua.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forrest city | Piqua |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (105) | 0.5% (109) |
High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,698) | 24.5% (5,047) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (2,241) | 13.5% (2,775) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (1,122) | 8.9% (1,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forrest city vs Piqua
- A higher percentage of residents in Forrest city have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Piqua.
- In Piqua, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 21.3% in Forrest city.
- More residents in Forrest city have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 13.5% in Piqua.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Forrest city and Piqua at 8.9%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.