Demographics details for Forrest city, AR vs Klickitat, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Forrest city, AR vs Klickitat, WA.

Data Forrest city Klickitat
Population 12,676 23,271
Median Age 35.2 years 47.0 years
Median Income $36,368 $66,581
Married Families 22.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 20% 8%
Unemployment Rate 6.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Forrest city vs Klickitat

  • The population in Klickitat is higher at 23,271, compared to 12,676 in Forrest city.
  • The median age in Klickitat is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 35.2 years in Forrest city.
  • Klickitat has a higher median income of $66,581, compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
  • In Klickitat, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
  • Forrest city has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 8% in Klickitat.
  • The unemployment rate in Forrest city is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.7% in Klickitat.

Demographics

Demographics Forrest city vs Klickitat provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Forrest city Klickitat
Black 73 1
White 16 77
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 6 12
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Forrest city vs Klickitat

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forrest city at 73% compared to 1% in Klickitat.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Klickitat at 77% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
  • In Klickitat, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Forrest city.
  • Klickitat has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Forrest city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klickitat at 8%, compared to 4% in Forrest city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forrest city and Klickitat at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Forrest city Klickitat
Mental Health Not Good 19.7% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 16.5% 11.7%
Depression 21.2% 25.6%
Smoking 26.2% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 12.5% 18.7%
Obesity 49.7% 30.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Forrest city vs Klickitat

  • More residents in Forrest city report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.6% in Klickitat.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klickitat at 25.6% versus 21.2% in Forrest city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Forrest city at 26.2% compared to 15.5% in Klickitat.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Klickitat at 18.7% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Forrest city at 49.7% compared to 30.7% in Klickitat.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Forrest city and Klickitat at 15.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Forrest city Klickitat
No Schooling 0.8% (105) 1.0% (223)
High School Diploma 21.3% (2,698) 16.1% (3,753)
Less than High School 17.7% (2,241) 15.2% (3,532)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.9% (1,122) 22.7% (5,271)

Education Levels Comparison: Forrest city vs Klickitat

  • In Klickitat, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Forrest city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Forrest city hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 16.1% in Klickitat.
  • More residents in Forrest city have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Klickitat.
  • In Klickitat, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.