Demographics details for Forrest city, AR vs Glen elder, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Forrest city, AR vs Glen elder, KS.

Data Forrest city Glen elder
Population 12,676 363
Median Age 35.2 years 42.7 years
Median Income $36,368 $65,417
Married Families 22.0% 80.0%
Poverty Level 20% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.5 3.0

Population Comparison: Forrest city vs Glen elder

  • In Forrest city, the population is higher at 12,676, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
  • The median age in Glen elder is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 35.2 years in Forrest city.
  • Glen elder has a higher median income of $65,417, compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
  • In Glen elder, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
  • Forrest city has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Glen elder.
  • The unemployment rate in Forrest city is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.

Demographics

Demographics Forrest city vs Glen elder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Forrest city Glen elder
Black 73 Data is updating
White 16 86
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 6 7
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Forrest city vs Glen elder

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forrest city at 73% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Glen elder at 86% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
  • In Glen elder, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Forrest city.
  • Glen elder has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Forrest city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glen elder at 5%, compared to 4% in Forrest city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Forrest city at 1% compared to 0% in Glen elder.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Forrest city Glen elder
Mental Health Not Good 19.7% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 16.5% 10.2%
Depression 21.2% 21.3%
Smoking 26.2% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 12.5% 19.5%
Obesity 49.7% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Forrest city vs Glen elder

  • More residents in Forrest city report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.8% in Glen elder.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Glen elder at 21.3% versus 21.2% in Forrest city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Forrest city at 26.2% compared to 17.7% in Glen elder.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Forrest city at 49.7% compared to 38.5% in Glen elder.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Forrest city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Forrest city Glen elder
No Schooling 0.8% (105) 0.6% (2)
High School Diploma 21.3% (2,698) 30.3% (110)
Less than High School 17.7% (2,241) 1.7% (6)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.9% (1,122) 16.5% (60)

Education Levels Comparison: Forrest city vs Glen elder

  • A higher percentage of residents in Forrest city have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Glen elder.
  • In Glen elder, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 21.3% in Forrest city.
  • More residents in Forrest city have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
  • In Glen elder, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.