Demographics details for Forrest city, AR vs Anderson, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Forrest city, AR vs Anderson, SC.

Data Forrest city Anderson
Population 12,676 29,771
Median Age 35.2 years 32.7 years
Median Income $36,368 $40,445
Married Families 22.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 20% 14%
Unemployment Rate 6.5 5.3

Population Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson

  • The population in Anderson is higher at 29,771, compared to 12,676 in Forrest city.
  • Residents in Forrest city have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
  • Anderson has a higher median income of $40,445, compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
  • In Anderson, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
  • Forrest city has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Anderson.
  • The unemployment rate in Forrest city is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.3% in Anderson.

Demographics

Demographics Forrest city vs Anderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Forrest city Anderson
Black 73 28
White 16 61
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 6 4
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forrest city at 73% compared to 28% in Anderson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Anderson at 61% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
  • In Anderson, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Forrest city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Forrest city at 6% compared to 4% in Anderson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Anderson at 5%, compared to 4% in Forrest city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Forrest city at 1% compared to 0% in Anderson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Forrest city Anderson
Mental Health Not Good 19.7% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 16.5% 14.0%
Depression 21.2% 22.6%
Smoking 26.2% 21.5%
Binge Drinking 12.5% 15.7%
Obesity 49.7% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson

  • More residents in Forrest city report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.2% in Anderson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Anderson at 22.6% versus 21.2% in Forrest city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Forrest city at 26.2% compared to 21.5% in Anderson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Anderson at 15.7% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Forrest city at 49.7% compared to 39.6% in Anderson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anderson at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Forrest city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Forrest city Anderson
No Schooling 0.8% (105) 0.8% (234)
High School Diploma 21.3% (2,698) 15.2% (4,532)
Less than High School 17.7% (2,241) 11.9% (3,538)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.9% (1,122) 15.8% (4,718)

Education Levels Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Forrest city and Anderson at 0.8%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Forrest city hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 15.2% in Anderson.
  • More residents in Forrest city have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
  • In Anderson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.