Demographics details for Forrest city, AR vs Anderson, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forrest city, AR vs Anderson, SC.
Data | Forrest city | Anderson |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,676 | 29,771 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $36,368 | $40,445 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson
- The population in Anderson is higher at 29,771, compared to 12,676 in Forrest city.
- Residents in Forrest city have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher median income of $40,445, compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
- In Anderson, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Anderson.
- The unemployment rate in Forrest city is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.3% in Anderson.
Demographics
Demographics Forrest city vs Anderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forrest city | Anderson |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 28 |
White | 16 | 61 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forrest city at 73% compared to 28% in Anderson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Anderson at 61% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
- In Anderson, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Forrest city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forrest city at 6% compared to 4% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Anderson at 5%, compared to 4% in Forrest city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Forrest city at 1% compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forrest city | Anderson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.0% |
Depression | 21.2% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 26.2% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 15.7% |
Obesity | 49.7% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson
- More residents in Forrest city report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.2% in Anderson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Anderson at 22.6% versus 21.2% in Forrest city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forrest city at 26.2% compared to 21.5% in Anderson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Anderson at 15.7% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forrest city at 49.7% compared to 39.6% in Anderson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anderson at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Forrest city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forrest city | Anderson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (105) | 0.8% (234) |
High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,698) | 15.2% (4,532) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (2,241) | 11.9% (3,538) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (1,122) | 15.8% (4,718) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forrest city vs Anderson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Forrest city and Anderson at 0.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forrest city hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 15.2% in Anderson.
- More residents in Forrest city have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- In Anderson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.