Demographics details for Forest, MS vs Hanover, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest, MS vs Hanover, MI.
| Data | Forest | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,330 | 474 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,093 | $65,250 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Forest vs Hanover
- In Forest, the population is higher at 5,330, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- The median age in Hanover is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Forest.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $65,250, compared to $50,093 in Forest.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Forest at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Hanover.
- Forest has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Hanover.
- The unemployment rate in Forest is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Hanover.
Demographics
Demographics Forest vs Hanover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 43 | 3 |
| White | 24 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest at 43% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hanover at 89% compared to 24% in Forest.
- Both Forest and Hanover have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest at 30% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover at 5%, compared to 3% in Forest.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest and Hanover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 45.7% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest vs Hanover
- More residents in Forest report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Hanover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hanover at 25.8% versus 21.2% in Forest.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest at 26.1% compared to 18.5% in Hanover.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 11.8% in Forest.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest at 45.7% compared to 34.2% in Hanover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Forest at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Hanover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.4% (232) | 0.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (557) | 29.5% (140) |
| Less than High School | 33.4% (1,779) | 2.7% (13) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (455) | 6.1% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest have no formal schooling at 4.4% compared to 0.4% in Hanover.
- In Hanover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.5% compared to 10.5% in Forest.
- More residents in Forest have less than a high school education at 33.4% compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.