Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Union grove, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Union grove, NC.

Data Forest park Union grove
Population 19,400 2,170
Median Age 31.3 years 37.0 years
Median Income $41,837 $65,000
Married Families 23.0% 65.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Forest park vs Union grove

  • In Forest park, the population is higher at 19,400, compared to 2,170 in Union grove.
  • The median age in Union grove is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
  • Union grove has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
  • In Union grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union grove at 12%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
  • The unemployment rate in Forest park is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Union grove.

Demographics

Demographics Forest park vs Union grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Forest park Union grove
Black 55 5
White 8 90
Asian 6 2
Hispanic 23 3
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Union grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 5% in Union grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Union grove at 90% compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 2% in Union grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 3% in Union grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Forest park at 8% compared to 0% in Union grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest park and Union grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Forest park Union grove
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% Data is updating%
Depression 17.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 13.3% Data is updating%
Obesity 43.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 15.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Union grove

  • More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Forest park at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Forest park at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Forest park Union grove
No Schooling 2.6% (504) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.4% (3,567) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 21.7% (4,202) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.4% (1,235) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Union grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.4% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.