Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs San dimas, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs San dimas, CA.
| Data | Forest park | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,400 | 33,535 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $41,837 | $102,241 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs San dimas
- The population in San dimas is higher at 33,535, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- The median age in San dimas is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- San dimas has a higher median income of $102,241, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In San dimas, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in San dimas.
- San dimas has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs San dimas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest park | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 3 |
| White | 8 | 25 |
| Asian | 6 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs San dimas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 3% in San dimas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San dimas at 25% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In San dimas, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 6% in Forest park.
- San dimas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 23% in Forest park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San dimas at 18%, compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In San dimas, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest park | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 26.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs San dimas
- More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.6% in San dimas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Forest park at 17.8% compared to 16.6% in San dimas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 9.3% in San dimas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San dimas at 16.7% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 26.3% in San dimas.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Forest park and San dimas at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest park | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 1.1% (362) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 13.8% (4,634) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 8.5% (2,851) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 28.3% (9,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs San dimas
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.1% in San dimas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 13.8% in San dimas.
- More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 8.5% in San dimas.
- In San dimas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.