Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Prescott valley, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Prescott valley, AZ.
Data | Forest park | Prescott valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,400 | 49,075 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $41,837 | $66,617 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Prescott valley
- The population in Prescott valley is higher at 49,075, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- The median age in Prescott valley is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In Prescott valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
- The unemployment rate in Forest park is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Prescott valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forest park | Prescott valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 55 | 1 |
White | 8 | 67 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 23 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Prescott valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Prescott valley at 67% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 19% in Prescott valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Prescott valley at 11%, compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Prescott valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forest park | Prescott valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 11.9% |
Depression | 17.8% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 22.7% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 43.0% | 28.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Prescott valley
- In Prescott valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Prescott valley at 22.8% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forest park | Prescott valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 0.8% (399) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 17.1% (8,386) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 12.3% (6,044) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 15.9% (7,817) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Prescott valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Prescott valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
- More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
- In Prescott valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.