Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Newark, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Newark, OH.
| Data | Forest park | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,400 | 50,763 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $41,837 | $56,284 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 50,763, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- The median age in Newark is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Newark has a higher median income of $56,284, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In Newark, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 12%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest park | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 3 |
| White | 8 | 88 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Newark
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 3% in Newark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Newark at 88% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 1% in Newark.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 3% in Newark.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Forest park at 8% compared to 5% in Newark.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest park and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest park | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Newark
- In Newark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newark at 26.0% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
- Newark has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 22.7% in Forest park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newark at 16.8% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 41.9% in Newark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newark at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest park | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 0.5% (258) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 21.6% (10,967) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 10.6% (5,370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 15.0% (7,627) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Newark
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.5% in Newark.
- In Newark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
- More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 10.6% in Newark.
- In Newark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.