Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Montebello, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Montebello, CA.
Data | Forest park | Montebello |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,400 | 60,569 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 38.0 years |
Median Income | $41,837 | $72,317 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Montebello
- The population in Montebello is higher at 60,569, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- The median age in Montebello is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Montebello has a higher median income of $72,317, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In Montebello, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- The poverty level is higher in Montebello at 15%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
- Montebello has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Montebello provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forest park | Montebello |
---|---|---|
Black | 55 | 1 |
White | 8 | -13 |
Asian | 6 | 14 |
Hispanic | 23 | 80 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Montebello
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 1% in Montebello.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of White residents at 8% compared to -13% in Montebello.
- In Montebello, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 6% in Forest park.
- Montebello has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 80%, compared to 23% in Forest park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Montebello at 15%, compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Montebello, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forest park | Montebello |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.6% |
Depression | 17.8% | 15.2% |
Smoking | 22.7% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 43.0% | 30.6% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Montebello
- More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Montebello.
- Depression is more prevalent in Forest park at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Montebello.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 11.0% in Montebello.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Montebello at 14.5% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 30.6% in Montebello.
- Disability percentages are higher in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Montebello.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forest park | Montebello |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 3.1% (1,890) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 16.2% (9,819) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 35.0% (21,175) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 15.4% (9,349) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Montebello
- In Montebello, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.6% in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in Montebello.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Montebello at 35.0%, compared to 21.7% in Forest park.
- In Montebello, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.