Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Milwaukee, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Milwaukee, WI.

Data Forest park Milwaukee
Population 19,400 563,305
Median Age 31.3 years 31.8 years
Median Income $41,837 $49,733
Married Families 23.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Forest park vs Milwaukee

  • The population in Milwaukee is higher at 563,305, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
  • The median age in Milwaukee is higher at 31.8 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
  • Milwaukee has a higher median income of $49,733, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Forest park and Milwaukee at 23.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Milwaukee at 18%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
  • Milwaukee has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.

Demographics

Demographics Forest park vs Milwaukee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Forest park Milwaukee
Black 55 39
White 8 24
Asian 6 5
Hispanic 23 21
Two or More Races 8 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Milwaukee

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 39% in Milwaukee.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Milwaukee at 24% compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 5% in Milwaukee.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 21% in Milwaukee.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Milwaukee at 10%, compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • In Milwaukee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Forest park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Forest park Milwaukee
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 12.7%
Depression 17.8% 22.9%
Smoking 22.7% 21.0%
Binge Drinking 13.3% 21.3%
Obesity 43.0% 41.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Milwaukee

  • More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.5% in Milwaukee.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Milwaukee at 22.9% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 21.0% in Milwaukee.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Milwaukee at 21.3% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 41.6% in Milwaukee.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Milwaukee.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Forest park Milwaukee
No Schooling 2.6% (504) 1.3% (7,509)
High School Diploma 18.4% (3,567) 16.7% (93,798)
Less than High School 21.7% (4,202) 14.4% (81,002)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.4% (1,235) 16.6% (93,378)

Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Milwaukee

  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.3% in Milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Milwaukee.
  • More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 14.4% in Milwaukee.
  • In Milwaukee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.