Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Laredo, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Laredo, TX.
Data | Forest park | Laredo |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,400 | 256,187 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 29.3 years |
Median Income | $41,837 | $60,928 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Laredo
- The population in Laredo is higher at 256,187, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- Residents in Forest park have a higher median age of 31.3 years compared to 29.3 years in Laredo.
- Laredo has a higher median income of $60,928, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In Laredo, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- The poverty level is higher in Laredo at 20%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
- Laredo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Laredo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forest park | Laredo |
---|---|---|
Black | 55 | 1 |
White | 8 | -36 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 23 | 95 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 39 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Laredo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 1% in Laredo.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of White residents at 8% compared to -36% in Laredo.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 1% in Laredo.
- Laredo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 95%, compared to 23% in Forest park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laredo at 39%, compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest park and Laredo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forest park | Laredo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.3% |
Depression | 17.8% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 22.7% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 43.0% | 45.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Laredo
- More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Laredo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laredo at 21.6% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 17.3% in Laredo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laredo at 15.2% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Laredo has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Forest park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Laredo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forest park | Laredo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 2.3% (5,932) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 10.0% (25,735) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 33.8% (86,667) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 11.8% (30,258) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Laredo
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.3% in Laredo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 10.0% in Laredo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laredo at 33.8%, compared to 21.7% in Forest park.
- In Laredo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.