Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Junction city, KS.

Data Forest park Junction city
Population 19,400 22,264
Median Age 31.3 years 28.5 years
Median Income $41,837 $60,709
Married Families 23.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Forest park vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
  • Residents in Forest park have a higher median age of 31.3 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
  • Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.

Demographics

Demographics Forest park vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Forest park Junction city
Black 55 20
White 8 43
Asian 6 3
Hispanic 23 18
Two or More Races 8 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Junction city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 20% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Junction city at 43% compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 3% in Junction city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 18% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Forest park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Forest park Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 11.0%
Depression 17.8% 19.2%
Smoking 22.7% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 13.3% 16.6%
Obesity 43.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Junction city

  • More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 19.2% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 41.8% in Junction city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Forest park Junction city
No Schooling 2.6% (504) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 18.4% (3,567) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 21.7% (4,202) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.4% (1,235) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Junction city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.