Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Camp hill, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Camp hill, PA.
| Data | Forest park | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,400 | 8,204 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $41,837 | $104,959 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Camp hill
- In Forest park, the population is higher at 19,400, compared to 8,204 in Camp hill.
- The median age in Camp hill is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Camp hill has a higher median income of $104,959, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In Camp hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- The unemployment rate in Forest park is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Camp hill.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Camp hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest park | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 2 |
| White | 8 | 82 |
| Asian | 6 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 2% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camp hill at 82% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- Both Forest park and Camp hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 6%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Forest park at 8% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest park and Camp hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest park | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Camp hill
- More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Camp hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camp hill at 20.4% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 12.8% in Camp hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camp hill at 17.3% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 28.8% in Camp hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Camp hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest park | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 0.6% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 9.2% (756) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 4.6% (381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 41.3% (3,388) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.6% in Camp hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 9.2% in Camp hill.
- More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 4.6% in Camp hill.
- In Camp hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.