Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Beaverton, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Beaverton, MI.
| Data | Forest park | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,400 | 1,156 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $41,837 | $31,985 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Beaverton
- In Forest park, the population is higher at 19,400, compared to 1,156 in Beaverton.
- The median age in Beaverton is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher median income of $41,837 compared to $31,985 in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- The poverty level is higher in Beaverton at 12%, compared to 10% in Forest park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Forest park and Beaverton at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest park | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 1 |
| White | 8 | 93 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaverton at 93% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 0% in Beaverton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Forest park at 8% compared to 5% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest park and Beaverton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest park | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaverton at 28.3% versus 17.8% in Forest park.
- Beaverton has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 22.7% in Forest park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaverton at 18.0% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 39.3% in Beaverton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaverton at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest park | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 1.0% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 25.3% (293) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 14.0% (162) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 8.0% (93) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.0% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
- More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 14.0% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.