Demographics details for Forest park, GA vs Ashton, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest park, GA vs Ashton, WV.
| Data | Forest park | Ashton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,400 | 200 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $41,837 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Forest park vs Ashton
- In Forest park, the population is higher at 19,400, compared to 200 in Ashton.
- The median age in Ashton is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Ashton has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- In Ashton, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Forest park and Ashton at 10%.
- Ashton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Forest park vs Ashton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest park | Ashton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | Data is updating |
| White | 8 | 95 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest park vs Ashton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Forest park at 55% compared to 0% in Ashton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashton at 95% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest park at 6% compared to 2% in Ashton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest park at 23% compared to 1% in Ashton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Forest park at 8% compared to 2% in Ashton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest park and Ashton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest park | Ashton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest park vs Ashton
- More residents in Forest park report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Forest park at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Forest park at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Forest park at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Forest park at 43.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest park | Ashton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (504) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (3,567) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (4,202) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (1,235) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest park vs Ashton
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- More residents in Forest park have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.4% compared to 0.0% in Ashton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.