Demographics details for Forest lake, MN vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest lake, MN vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Forest lake | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,857 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $91,157 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Forest lake vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
- Residents in Forest lake have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Forest lake at 42.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- Stillwater has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Forest lake vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest lake | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 81 | 72 |
| Asian | 4 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Forest lake vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Forest lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest lake at 6% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Forest lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest lake | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest lake vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 24.1% in Forest lake.
- Stillwater has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stillwater at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest lake | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (101) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,055) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,615) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.6% (5,123) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest lake vs Stillwater
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Forest lake and Stillwater at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Forest lake have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 22.5% in Stillwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.