Demographics details for Forest lake, MN vs Grandview, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest lake, MN vs Grandview, MO.
Data | Forest lake | Grandview |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,857 | 25,610 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $91,157 | $51,048 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Forest lake vs Grandview
- The population in Grandview is higher at 25,610, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
- Residents in Forest lake have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 35.9 years in Grandview.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157 compared to $51,048 in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Forest lake at 42.0% compared to 30.0% in Grandview.
- The poverty level is higher in Grandview at 9%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- Grandview has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Forest lake vs Grandview provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forest lake | Grandview |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 34 |
White | 81 | 40 |
Asian | 4 | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Forest lake vs Grandview
- In Grandview, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 40% in Grandview.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest lake at 4% compared to 2% in Grandview.
- Grandview has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grandview at 8%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- In Grandview, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Forest lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forest lake | Grandview |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 13.1% |
Depression | 24.1% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 20.4% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest lake vs Grandview
- In Grandview, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Forest lake at 24.1% compared to 21.6% in Grandview.
- Grandview has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 18.1% in Grandview.
- Grandview has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grandview at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forest lake | Grandview |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (101) | 0.8% (200) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,055) | 19.0% (4,878) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (1,615) | 10.6% (2,721) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.6% (5,123) | 16.2% (4,147) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest lake vs Grandview
- In Grandview, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- In Grandview, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grandview at 10.6%, compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 16.2% in Grandview.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.