Demographics details for Forest lake, MN vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest lake, MN vs Friendship, WI.
Data | Forest lake | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,857 | 681 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 50.3 years |
Median Income | $91,157 | $45,208 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Forest lake vs Friendship
- In Forest lake, the population is higher at 20,857, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Forest lake at 42.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Forest lake vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forest lake | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 81 | 84 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Forest lake vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 81% in Forest lake.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest lake at 4% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest lake at 6% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Forest lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forest lake | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 12.4% |
Depression | 24.1% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 23.9% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest lake vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 24.1% in Forest lake.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 21.4% in Forest lake.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forest lake | Friendship |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (101) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,055) | 26.9% (183) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (1,615) | 26.0% (177) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.6% (5,123) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest lake vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.