Demographics details for Forest lake, MN vs Ehrhardt, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest lake, MN vs Ehrhardt, SC.
Data | Forest lake | Ehrhardt |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,857 | 438 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 63.5 years |
Median Income | $91,157 | $35,923 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Forest lake vs Ehrhardt
- In Forest lake, the population is higher at 20,857, compared to 438 in Ehrhardt.
- The median age in Ehrhardt is higher at 63.5 years, compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157 compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 42.0% in Forest lake.
- The poverty level is higher in Ehrhardt at 19%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- Ehrhardt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Forest lake vs Ehrhardt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Forest lake | Ehrhardt |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 50 |
White | 81 | 50 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest lake vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 50% in Ehrhardt.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest lake at 4% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest lake at 6% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Forest lake at 6% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest lake and Ehrhardt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Forest lake | Ehrhardt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 12.0% |
Depression | 24.1% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest lake vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Forest lake at 24.1% compared to 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 16.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Forest lake | Ehrhardt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (101) | 3.0% (13) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,055) | 26.9% (118) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (1,615) | 23.5% (103) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.6% (5,123) | 27.2% (119) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest lake vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- In Ehrhardt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ehrhardt at 23.5%, compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- In Ehrhardt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.