Demographics details for Forest lake, MN vs Bowman, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Forest lake, MN vs Bowman, SC.
| Data | Forest lake | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,857 | 769 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 47.2 years |
| Median Income | $91,157 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Forest lake vs Bowman
- In Forest lake, the population is higher at 20,857, compared to 769 in Bowman.
- The median age in Bowman is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157 compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Forest lake at 42.0% compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bowman at 15%, compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- Bowman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Forest lake vs Bowman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Forest lake | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 66 |
| White | 81 | 33 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Forest lake vs Bowman
- In Bowman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 33% in Bowman.
- The Asian population is larger in Forest lake at 4% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Forest lake at 6% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Forest lake at 6% compared to 1% in Bowman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Forest lake and Bowman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Forest lake | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Forest lake vs Bowman
- In Bowman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Forest lake at 24.1% compared to 19.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Forest lake | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (101) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,055) | 26.4% (203) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,615) | 12.6% (97) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.6% (5,123) | 7.3% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Forest lake vs Bowman
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
- In Bowman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bowman at 12.6%, compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Forest lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.