Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Sierra vista, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Sierra vista, AZ.
| Data | Fontana | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212,475 | 45,439 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $93,230 | $70,899 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fontana vs Sierra vista
- In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 45,439 in Sierra vista.
- The median age in Sierra vista is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $70,899 in Sierra vista.
- In Sierra vista, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fontana and Sierra vista at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Sierra vista.
Demographics
Demographics Fontana vs Sierra vista provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fontana | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 8 |
| White | 2 | 48 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 68 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Sierra vista
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fontana and Sierra vista at 8%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sierra vista at 48% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 4% in Sierra vista.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 24% in Sierra vista.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sierra vista at 15%, compared to 14% in Fontana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fontana and Sierra vista at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fontana | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Sierra vista
- More residents in Fontana report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.4% in Sierra vista.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sierra vista at 20.8% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
- Sierra vista has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sierra vista at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fontana at 38.6% compared to 32.2% in Sierra vista.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sierra vista at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fontana | Sierra vista |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (4,748) | 0.5% (224) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (34,556) | 11.7% (5,296) |
| Less than High School | 25.3% (53,655) | 8.2% (3,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (25,587) | 22.8% (10,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Sierra vista
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.5% in Sierra vista.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 11.7% in Sierra vista.
- More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 8.2% in Sierra vista.
- In Sierra vista, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.