Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Parksley, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Parksley, VA.
| Data | Fontana | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212,475 | 808 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $93,230 | $74,844 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fontana vs Parksley
- In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- The median age in Parksley is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $74,844 in Parksley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fontana at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
- Fontana has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Parksley.
- The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Parksley.
Demographics
Demographics Fontana vs Parksley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fontana | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 35 |
| White | 2 | 46 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 68 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Parksley
- In Parksley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parksley at 46% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 0% in Parksley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 13% in Parksley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fontana at 14% compared to 6% in Parksley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fontana at 1% compared to 0% in Parksley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fontana | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Parksley at 23.3% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
- Parksley has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parksley at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Parksley has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parksley at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fontana | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (4,748) | 2.0% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (34,556) | 19.1% (154) |
| Less than High School | 25.3% (53,655) | 22.3% (180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (25,587) | 17.9% (145) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Parksley
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 2.0% in Parksley.
- In Parksley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 22.3% in Parksley.
- In Parksley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.