Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Okemah, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Okemah, OK.
Data | Fontana | Okemah |
---|---|---|
Population | 212,475 | 3,010 |
Median Age | 32.6 years | 34.1 years |
Median Income | $93,230 | $34,882 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fontana vs Okemah
- In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 3,010 in Okemah.
- The median age in Okemah is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $34,882 in Okemah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fontana at 36.0% compared to 28.0% in Okemah.
- The poverty level is higher in Okemah at 20%, compared to 13% in Fontana.
- The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Okemah.
Demographics
Demographics Fontana vs Okemah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fontana | Okemah |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 2 |
White | 2 | 54 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 68 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Okemah
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fontana at 8% compared to 2% in Okemah.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Okemah at 54% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 0% in Okemah.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 7% in Okemah.
- Both Fontana and Okemah have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 14%.
- In Okemah, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 1% in Fontana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fontana | Okemah |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 22.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 17.5% |
Depression | 17.0% | 28.0% |
Smoking | 12.4% | 29.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 13.1% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 43.8% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Okemah
- In Okemah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Okemah at 28.0% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
- Okemah has a higher smoking rate at 29.3% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fontana at 15.1% compared to 13.1% in Okemah.
- Okemah has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Okemah at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fontana | Okemah |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (4,748) | 0.4% (11) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (34,556) | 24.8% (746) |
Less than High School | 25.3% (53,655) | 17.5% (528) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (25,587) | 6.1% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Okemah
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.4% in Okemah.
- In Okemah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 17.5% in Okemah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 6.1% in Okemah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.