Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Chester, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Chester, MT.
| Data | Fontana | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212,475 | 852 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 49.1 years |
| Median Income | $93,230 | $52,750 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fontana vs Chester
- In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 852 in Chester.
- The median age in Chester is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $52,750 in Chester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fontana at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Chester.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fontana and Chester at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Chester.
Demographics
Demographics Fontana vs Chester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fontana | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 2 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 68 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Chester
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fontana at 8% compared to 0% in Chester.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chester at 94% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 0% in Chester.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 1% in Chester.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fontana at 14% compared to 4% in Chester.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fontana and Chester at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fontana | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 20.7% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Chester
- In Chester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chester at 26.6% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
- Chester has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chester at 20.7% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fontana at 38.6% compared to 37.3% in Chester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chester at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fontana | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (4,748) | 0.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (34,556) | 16.1% (137) |
| Less than High School | 25.3% (53,655) | 11.9% (101) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (25,587) | 16.1% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Chester
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.2% in Chester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Chester.
- More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 11.9% in Chester.
- In Chester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.