Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Belgrade, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Belgrade, MT.
| Data | Fontana | Belgrade |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212,475 | 11,966 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $93,230 | $82,769 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fontana vs Belgrade
- In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 11,966 in Belgrade.
- The median age in Belgrade is higher at 33.4 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $82,769 in Belgrade.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fontana and Belgrade at 36.0%.
- Fontana has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Belgrade.
- The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Belgrade.
Demographics
Demographics Fontana vs Belgrade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fontana | Belgrade |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 2 | 93 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 68 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Belgrade
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fontana at 8% compared to 0% in Belgrade.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Belgrade at 93% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 1% in Belgrade.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 2% in Belgrade.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fontana at 14% compared to 3% in Belgrade.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fontana and Belgrade at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fontana | Belgrade |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Belgrade
- More residents in Fontana report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Belgrade.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Belgrade at 23.1% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
- Belgrade has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Belgrade at 23.9% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fontana at 38.6% compared to 24.6% in Belgrade.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fontana at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Belgrade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fontana | Belgrade |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (4,748) | 0.2% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (34,556) | 14.4% (1,727) |
| Less than High School | 25.3% (53,655) | 2.5% (301) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (25,587) | 22.3% (2,670) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Belgrade
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.2% in Belgrade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 14.4% in Belgrade.
- More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 2.5% in Belgrade.
- In Belgrade, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.