Demographics details for Fond du lac, WI vs Wallace, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fond du lac, WI vs Wallace, SC.
Data | Fond du lac | Wallace |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,339 | 662 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 59.8 years |
Median Income | $58,675 | $19,423 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fond du lac vs Wallace
- In Fond du lac, the population is higher at 44,339, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- The median age in Wallace is higher at 59.8 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher median income of $58,675 compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fond du lac at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Wallace.
- The poverty level is higher in Wallace at 22%, compared to 8% in Fond du lac.
- Wallace has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Fond du lac.
Demographics
Demographics Fond du lac vs Wallace provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fond du lac | Wallace |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 42 |
White | 81 | 44 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Fond du lac vs Wallace
- In Wallace, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 3% in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- The Asian population is larger in Fond du lac at 3% compared to 0% in Wallace.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fond du lac at 8% compared to 0% in Wallace.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wallace at 10%, compared to 5% in Fond du lac.
- In Wallace, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Fond du lac.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fond du lac | Wallace |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 15.0% |
Depression | 23.7% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 16.5% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 41.2% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fond du lac vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 15.6% in Fond du lac.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fond du lac at 23.7% compared to 22.5% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 16.5% in Fond du lac.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fond du lac at 23.0% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Wallace has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 41.1% in Fond du lac.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Fond du lac.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fond du lac | Wallace |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (370) | 1.5% (10) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (9,143) | 57.4% (380) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (5,248) | 28.2% (187) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (6,416) | 1.1% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fond du lac vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Fond du lac.
- In Wallace, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 57.4% compared to 20.6% in Fond du lac.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wallace at 28.2%, compared to 11.8% in Fond du lac.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fond du lac hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.