Demographics details for Fond du lac, WI vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fond du lac, WI vs Aulander, NC.
Data | Fond du lac | Aulander |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,339 | 727 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $58,675 | $33,250 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Fond du lac vs Aulander
- In Fond du lac, the population is higher at 44,339, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher median income of $58,675 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fond du lac at 36.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- The poverty level is higher in Aulander at 14%, compared to 8% in Fond du lac.
- Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Fond du lac.
Demographics
Demographics Fond du lac vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fond du lac | Aulander |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 61 |
White | 81 | 38 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fond du lac vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 3% in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- The Asian population is larger in Fond du lac at 3% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fond du lac at 8% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fond du lac at 5% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fond du lac and Aulander at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fond du lac | Aulander |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 14.7% |
Depression | 23.7% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 16.5% | 23.9% |
Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 44.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fond du lac vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.6% in Fond du lac.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fond du lac at 23.7% compared to 23.5% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 16.5% in Fond du lac.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fond du lac at 23.0% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 41.1% in Fond du lac.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Fond du lac.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fond du lac | Aulander |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (370) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (9,143) | 13.3% (97) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (5,248) | 28.5% (207) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (6,416) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fond du lac vs Aulander
- A higher percentage of residents in Fond du lac have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fond du lac hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 11.8% in Fond du lac.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fond du lac hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.