Demographics details for Folsom, CA vs Red river, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Folsom, CA vs Red river, NM.
| Data | Folsom | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,269 | 539 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 43.3 years |
| Median Income | $134,935 | $49,479 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Folsom vs Red river
- In Folsom, the population is higher at 83,269, compared to 539 in Red river.
- The median age in Red river is higher at 43.3 years, compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935 compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Folsom at 44.0% compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- The poverty level is higher in Red river at 12%, compared to 7% in Folsom.
- Red river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Folsom vs Red river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Folsom | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 54 | 89 |
| Asian | 18 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Folsom vs Red river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Folsom at 4% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red river at 89% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- The Asian population is larger in Folsom at 18% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Folsom at 14% compared to 9% in Red river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Folsom at 10% compared to 2% in Red river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Folsom and Red river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Folsom | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Folsom vs Red river
- In Red river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Red river at 22.0% versus 17.7% in Folsom.
- Red river has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Red river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Folsom at 28.0% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Red river at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Folsom | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (451) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (6,439) | 5.9% (32) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (5,119) | 6.7% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.4% (30,311) | 26.2% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Folsom vs Red river
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a high school diploma at 7.7% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Red river at 6.7%, compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 26.2% in Red river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.