Demographics details for Folsom, CA vs Lakeville, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Folsom, CA vs Lakeville, MA.
| Data | Folsom | Lakeville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,269 | 11,418 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $134,935 | $100,000 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Folsom vs Lakeville
- In Folsom, the population is higher at 83,269, compared to 11,418 in Lakeville.
- The median age in Lakeville is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935 compared to $100,000 in Lakeville.
- In Lakeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 44.0% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Lakeville.
- The unemployment rate in Folsom is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Lakeville.
Demographics
Demographics Folsom vs Lakeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Folsom | Lakeville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 54 | 90 |
| Asian | 18 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Folsom vs Lakeville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Folsom at 4% compared to 2% in Lakeville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lakeville at 90% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- The Asian population is larger in Folsom at 18% compared to 5% in Lakeville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Folsom at 14% compared to 2% in Lakeville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Folsom at 10% compared to 1% in Lakeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Folsom and Lakeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Folsom | Lakeville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Folsom vs Lakeville
- More residents in Folsom report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Folsom at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Folsom at 9.5% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Folsom at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Folsom at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Folsom | Lakeville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (451) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (6,439) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (5,119) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.4% (30,311) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Folsom vs Lakeville
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a high school diploma at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- More residents in Folsom have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 0.0% in Lakeville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.