Demographics details for Folsom, CA vs Kaufman, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Folsom, CA vs Kaufman, TX.
| Data | Folsom | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,269 | 172,366 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $134,935 | $84,075 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Folsom vs Kaufman
- The population in Kaufman is higher at 172,366, compared to 83,269 in Folsom.
- Residents in Folsom have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 34.6 years in Kaufman.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935 compared to $84,075 in Kaufman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Folsom at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Kaufman.
- The poverty level is higher in Kaufman at 10%, compared to 7% in Folsom.
- Kaufman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Folsom vs Kaufman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Folsom | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 13 |
| White | 54 | 53 |
| Asian | 18 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Folsom vs Kaufman
- In Kaufman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 53% in Kaufman.
- The Asian population is larger in Folsom at 18% compared to 1% in Kaufman.
- Kaufman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 14% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kaufman at 11%, compared to 10% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Folsom and Kaufman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Folsom | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Folsom vs Kaufman
- In Kaufman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kaufman at 22.6% versus 17.7% in Folsom.
- Kaufman has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kaufman at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Folsom.
- Kaufman has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kaufman at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Folsom | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (451) | 1.4% (2,482) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (6,439) | 12.9% (22,235) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (5,119) | 14.2% (24,496) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.4% (30,311) | 13.1% (22,541) |
Education Levels Comparison: Folsom vs Kaufman
- In Kaufman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- In Kaufman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.9% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kaufman at 14.2%, compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 13.1% in Kaufman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.