Demographics details for Folsom, CA vs Janesville, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Folsom, CA vs Janesville, WI.
| Data | Folsom | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,269 | 65,911 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $134,935 | $68,610 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Folsom vs Janesville
- In Folsom, the population is higher at 83,269, compared to 65,911 in Janesville.
- Residents in Folsom have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 39.5 years in Janesville.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935 compared to $68,610 in Janesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Folsom at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Janesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Janesville at 9%, compared to 7% in Folsom.
- The unemployment rate in Folsom is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Janesville.
Demographics
Demographics Folsom vs Janesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Folsom | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 54 | 85 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Folsom vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Folsom at 4% compared to 3% in Janesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Janesville at 85% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- The Asian population is larger in Folsom at 18% compared to 2% in Janesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Folsom at 14% compared to 5% in Janesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Folsom at 10% compared to 5% in Janesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Folsom and Janesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Folsom | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 23.4% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Folsom vs Janesville
- In Janesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Janesville at 25.1% versus 17.7% in Folsom.
- Janesville has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Janesville at 23.4% compared to 17.8% in Folsom.
- Janesville has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Janesville at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Folsom | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (451) | 0.5% (330) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (6,439) | 20.4% (13,471) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (5,119) | 8.0% (5,276) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.4% (30,311) | 18.1% (11,899) |
Education Levels Comparison: Folsom vs Janesville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Folsom and Janesville at 0.5%.
- In Janesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Janesville at 8.0%, compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.