Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs West jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs West jordan, UT.
Data | Flomaton | West jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,458 | 116,664 |
Median Age | 32.6 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $37,500 | $99,002 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs West jordan
- The population in West jordan is higher at 116,664, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- The median age is the same in both Flomaton and West jordan at 32.6 years.
- West jordan has a higher median income of $99,002, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- In West jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in West jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in West jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs West jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flomaton | West jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 1 |
White | 58 | 62 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 23 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs West jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 1% in West jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in West jordan at 62% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- In West jordan, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
- West jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in West jordan at 10%, compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- In West jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flomaton | West jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 10.7% |
Depression | 24.6% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 9.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 45.3% | 31.1% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs West jordan
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.2% in West jordan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in West jordan at 27.0% versus 24.6% in Flomaton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 9.2% in West jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in West jordan at 15.9% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 31.1% in West jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in West jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flomaton | West jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (961) |
High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 14.5% (16,942) |
Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 9.5% (11,126) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 17.0% (19,799) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs West jordan
- In West jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 14.5% in West jordan.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 9.5% in West jordan.
- In West jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.