Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Tea, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Tea, SD.
| Data | Flomaton | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 6,918 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 30.2 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $99,153 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Tea
- The population in Tea is higher at 6,918, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Flomaton have a higher median age of 32.6 years compared to 30.2 years in Tea.
- Tea has a higher median income of $99,153, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- In Tea, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Tea.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.5% in Tea.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Tea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 2 |
| White | 58 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Tea
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 2% in Tea.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tea at 95% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- In Tea, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Flomaton and Tea at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Flomaton at 4% compared to 2% in Tea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flomaton and Tea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 11.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Tea
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 11.3% in Tea.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 16.6% in Tea.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 12.6% in Tea.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tea at 21.6% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 34.5% in Tea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 4.0% in Tea.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 7.8% (537) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 1.6% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 19.9% (1,378) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Tea
- In Tea, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 7.8% in Tea.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 1.6% in Tea.
- In Tea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.