Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Saratoga springs, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Saratoga springs, NY.

Data Flomaton Saratoga springs
Population 1,458 28,593
Median Age 32.6 years 41.8 years
Median Income $37,500 $97,241
Married Families 35.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 15% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.3

Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Saratoga springs

  • The population in Saratoga springs is higher at 28,593, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
  • The median age in Saratoga springs is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
  • In Saratoga springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
  • Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Saratoga springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Saratoga springs.

Demographics

Demographics Flomaton vs Saratoga springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Flomaton Saratoga springs
Black 38 3
White 58 86
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Saratoga springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 3% in Saratoga springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Saratoga springs at 86% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
  • In Saratoga springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • Both Flomaton and Saratoga springs have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flomaton and Saratoga springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Flomaton Saratoga springs
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.3% 8.2%
Depression 24.6% 20.8%
Smoking 24.1% 13.2%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 21.5%
Obesity 45.3% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Saratoga springs

  • More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 13.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 20.8% in Saratoga springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Flomaton Saratoga springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (208)
High School Diploma 25.0% (364) 11.0% (3,147)
Less than High School 19.1% (278) 6.3% (1,801)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.4% (137) 42.3% (12,109)

Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Saratoga springs

  • In Saratoga springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 6.3% in Saratoga springs.
  • In Saratoga springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.